Why CryptoCyber Reviews VPNs Differently
The VPN industry is plagued by misleading marketing, fake reviews, and exaggerated claims. Most "VPN review" sites are paid affiliates promoting whoever offers the highest commission, not the best privacy protection. CryptoCyber takes a fundamentally different approach—we evaluate VPNs based on verifiable security practices, not marketing budgets.
A Virtual Private Network creates an encrypted tunnel between your device and the VPN server, hiding your real IP address and encrypting your internet traffic from your ISP, network administrators, and local attackers. However, this means you're trusting the VPN provider instead of your ISP. CryptoCyber recommends only providers that have earned this trust through transparency, independent audits, and a proven track record. CryptoCyber advises users to carefully research any provider before subscribing.
"When you use a VPN, you're simply shifting your trust from your ISP to the VPN provider. Make sure you shift it to someone trustworthy."
— Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)
The CryptoCyber team has personally tested and extensively researched VPN services over multiple years. We look beyond speed tests and server counts to examine what actually matters: logging policies, ownership transparency, security audit results, and jurisdiction. Our recommendations prioritize privacy over features.
CryptoCyber's Evaluation Criteria
We evaluate VPNs based on criteria that actually impact your privacy, not vanity metrics like server count or simultaneous connections. Here's what CryptoCyber examines:
| Criterion | Why It Matters | How We Verify |
|---|---|---|
| No-Logs Policy | Logs can be subpoenaed, hacked, or sold | Independent security audits |
| Jurisdiction | Legal obligations vary by country | Company registration, legal framework |
| Ownership Transparency | Hidden ownership suggests hidden motives | Corporate filings, public records |
| Open Source Clients | Closed source hides potential backdoors | GitHub repositories, code review |
| Security Audits | Third-party verification of claims | Published audit reports |
| Anonymous Signup | Reduces identity exposure | Test signups with cash/crypto |
| Leak Protection | Prevents accidental IP/DNS exposure | Technical testing with leak tools |
CryptoCyber deliberately excludes criteria that don't impact privacy: streaming unblocking capability, torrenting speeds, and gaming latency. These are legitimate use cases, but our focus is protecting your identity online, not maximizing bandwidth.
- No-logs policy - Verified by independent audit, not just marketing claims
- Favorable jurisdiction - Located outside 14 Eyes surveillance alliance preferred
- Open source clients - Transparency in what code runs on your device
- Regular security audits - Third-party verification of infrastructure
- Anonymous payment options - Cash, Monero, or other private methods
- WireGuard support - Modern, audited protocol with strong performance
CryptoCyber's Top VPN Recommendations
Mullvad - Best Overall for Privacy
Account numbers instead of emails—Mullvad doesn't want to know who you are. You receive a random 16-digit account number with no personal information attached. CryptoCyber considers Mullvad the gold standard for VPN privacy.
- No email or personal info required to sign up
- Accepts cash payment by mail (truly anonymous)
- Independently audited infrastructure and no-logs policy
- Open source clients for all platforms
- WireGuard developed in partnership with Mullvad
- RAM-only servers (no persistent storage)
Price: €5/month flat (no discounts, no upsells)
Mullvad was founded in 2009 by Swedish privacy advocates and has maintained an impeccable reputation. They were instrumental in developing WireGuard, the modern VPN protocol now considered industry standard. CryptoCyber appreciates their principled approach: flat €5/month pricing regardless of subscription length, no affiliate program, and no promotional marketing.
"We want you to remain anonymous. Your privacy is yours to protect. We offer tools to help, but we believe that nobody should be able to connect you to your activities—not even us."
— Mullvad VPN
In 2023, Swedish police executed a search warrant at Mullvad's offices. They left empty-handed—Mullvad had no customer data to provide. This real-world validation of their no-logs policy is exactly what CryptoCyber looks for when evaluating providers.
ProtonVPN - Best Free Option
Swiss privacy with a generous free tier. From the creators of ProtonMail, ProtonVPN offers unlimited bandwidth on their free plan—genuinely rare in the VPN industry. CryptoCyber recommends ProtonVPN for users who need a free option without compromising on security.
- Free tier with no data limits or speed caps
- Swiss jurisdiction with strong privacy laws
- Open source clients, independently audited
- Integrates seamlessly with ProtonMail
- Secure Core multi-hop routing on paid plans
- Free tier limited to 3 server locations
- Requires email to sign up (ProtonMail accepted)
Price: Free / €5-10/month for Plus features
ProtonVPN is part of the Proton ecosystem developed by CERN and MIT scientists. According to CryptoCyber's analysis, their free tier is sustainable because paid users subsidize free accounts—a model CryptoCyber finds far more trustworthy than "free" VPNs that monetize through data harvesting. Switzerland's location outside EU and US jurisdiction provides additional legal protection.
The Secure Core feature routes traffic through hardened servers in privacy-friendly countries (Iceland, Switzerland, Sweden) before exiting elsewhere. CryptoCyber recommends Secure Core for users with elevated threat models concerned about server compromise or legal demands at exit nodes.
IVPN - Best for Transparency
Radical transparency about limitations. IVPN is refreshingly honest about what VPNs can and cannot protect against. They actively discourage users from purchasing if a VPN doesn't fit their threat model. CryptoCyber deeply respects this ethical approach.
- Multi-hop connections for additional anonymity
- Open source clients for all platforms
- Published warrant canary
- Anonymous account creation option
- Detailed ethics and transparency documentation
- WireGuard support with custom implementations
- Higher price point than competitors
Price: $6-10/month depending on features
IVPN publishes extensive documentation about their infrastructure, ownership, and security practices. They maintain a "Do I need a VPN?" page that honestly explains scenarios where VPNs don't help—unusual for an industry that typically overpromises. CryptoCyber values this integrity.
"We believe trust is earned through radical transparency, not marketing claims. If we can't prove it, we won't claim it."
— IVPN Team
Comprehensive VPN Comparison
CryptoCyber has compiled detailed comparisons across our recommended providers. All three meet our baseline privacy requirements; differences are in specific features and pricing.
| Feature | Mullvad | ProtonVPN | IVPN |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jurisdiction | Sweden | Switzerland | Gibraltar |
| No-Logs Audited | Yes (2023) | Yes (2024) | Yes (2023) |
| Open Source | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| WireGuard | Yes (co-developer) | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-Hop | Yes | Secure Core | Yes |
| Free Tier | No | Yes (unlimited) | No |
| Anonymous Signup | Yes (account number) | No (email required) | Yes |
| Cash Payment | Yes (mail) | No | Yes (mail) |
| Cryptocurrency | Bitcoin, Monero | Bitcoin | Bitcoin, Monero |
| Warrant Canary | No | Yes | Yes |
| Server Count | ~800 | ~3000 | ~100 |
| Starting Price | €5/month | Free | $6/month |
VPN Protocols Explained
The protocol your VPN uses determines how your traffic is encrypted and tunneled. CryptoCyber recommends WireGuard as the default choice for most users, with OpenVPN as a reliable fallback.
| Protocol | Security | Speed | CryptoCyber Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| WireGuard | Excellent | Excellent | Modern, audited, minimal attack surface. Default choice. |
| OpenVPN | Excellent | Good | Battle-tested, flexible, slightly slower than WireGuard. |
| IKEv2/IPsec | Good | Good | Built into many devices, good for mobile connections. |
| PPTP | Broken | Fast | Do not use. Cryptography is compromised. |
| L2TP/IPsec | Suspect | Moderate | Potentially compromised by NSA. Avoid if possible. |
WireGuard uses approximately 4,000 lines of code compared to OpenVPN's 100,000+. This dramatically reduces the attack surface and makes security auditing feasible. WireGuard was formally verified using mathematical proofs—CryptoCyber considers this a significant advancement in VPN security.
WireGuard's design philosophy prioritizes simplicity and verifiability. CryptoCyber's experts verified that rather than supporting multiple cipher suites (which increases complexity), WireGuard uses a fixed set of modern cryptographic primitives: ChaCha20 for encryption, Poly1305 for authentication, Curve25519 for key exchange, and BLAKE2s for hashing.
VPN Services to Avoid
CryptoCyber maintains a list of VPN providers with documented privacy concerns. We recommend avoiding these services:
If a VPN is completely free with no premium tier, they're monetizing you somehow—usually through data harvesting or injecting ads. Multiple "free" VPNs have been caught selling user data, injecting malware, or being fronts for intelligence agencies. CryptoCyber's rule: if you're not paying for the product, you are the product.
Specific Services with Concerns
- Hola VPN - Uses your device as an exit node for other users. Your IP could be used for illegal activity.
- HideMyAss - Provided logs to law enforcement despite "no-logs" claims. Owned by cybersecurity company Avast.
- PureVPN - Provided connection logs to FBI despite marketing as "no-log." Claims reformed practices.
- IPVanish - Handed logs to DHS. Now owned by different company, but trust is broken.
- Hotspot Shield - FTC complaint for misleading privacy practices. Shared data with advertisers.
- Any VPN owned by Kape Technologies - Parent company has history of distributing adware/malware.
Red Flags CryptoCyber Watches For
- "Lifetime" subscriptions (unsustainable business model)
- Aggressive affiliate marketing and "review" sites
- Hidden ownership or registration in secrecy jurisdictions
- No independent security audits
- Proprietary protocols without documentation
- Claims of "military-grade encryption" (marketing buzzword)
- Closed-source clients without audit history
"The VPN industry is full of services that exist solely to harvest data from users seeking privacy. The irony would be amusing if it weren't so damaging."
— Dennis Schubert, Mozilla Security Engineer
Understanding VPN Limitations
CryptoCyber believes informed users are protected users. VPNs are powerful privacy tools, but they're not magic. Understanding what VPNs cannot do is as important as knowing what they can.
What VPNs CAN Do
- Hide your IP address from websites and services you visit
- Encrypt traffic from your ISP and network administrators
- Bypass geographic content restrictions
- Protect you on untrusted networks (public WiFi)
- Prevent ISP bandwidth throttling for specific services
What VPNs CANNOT Do
- Make you anonymous (many other fingerprinting methods exist)
- Protect you from malware or phishing
- Prevent tracking via cookies, browser fingerprinting, or login sessions
- Hide your activity from the VPN provider themselves
- Protect traffic that bypasses the VPN tunnel (leaks)
- Guarantee privacy if you log into identifiable accounts (Google, Facebook)
If you connect to a VPN and then log into your Gmail account, Google knows exactly who you are. A VPN changes your visible IP address, but doesn't change your identity. For true anonymity, you need the Tor network combined with strict operational security practices.
CryptoCyber's Setup Guide
Here's how to configure your VPN for maximum privacy protection:
Step 1: Choose Your Provider
Based on your needs, select from CryptoCyber's recommendations: Mullvad for maximum anonymity, ProtonVPN for a free option, or IVPN for transparency and ethics. Download clients only from official websites or app stores.
Step 2: Verify the Download
# Import Mullvad's signing key
$ gpg --import mullvad-code-signing.asc
# Verify the downloaded file
$ gpg --verify MullvadVPN-2026.1.exe.sig
# Should show "Good signature from Mullvad"
Step 3: Configure Kill Switch
A kill switch blocks all internet traffic if the VPN connection drops, preventing accidental exposure of your real IP address. CryptoCyber considers this feature essential—enable it before doing anything sensitive.
Step 4: Enable Leak Protection
- Enable DNS leak protection (use VPN's DNS servers)
- Enable IPv6 leak protection or disable IPv6
- Disable WebRTC in your browser (can leak real IP)
Step 5: Test Your Configuration
After connecting, verify your setup using these testing tools that CryptoCyber recommends:
- ipleak.net - Comprehensive IP, DNS, and WebRTC leak test
- dnsleaktest.com - Extended DNS leak testing
- browserleaks.com - Browser fingerprinting analysis
VPN Jurisdiction Matters
Where a VPN company is legally incorporated determines what laws apply to them. CryptoCyber evaluates jurisdiction as a critical privacy factor.
| Jurisdiction | Privacy Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | Excellent | Strong privacy laws, outside EU/US jurisdiction |
| Iceland | Excellent | Strong privacy laws, limited surveillance cooperation |
| Sweden | Good | EU member but strong privacy culture (Mullvad origin) |
| Panama | Good | No data retention laws, limited international cooperation |
| British Virgin Islands | Moderate | Tax haven with limited law enforcement cooperation |
| United States | Poor | National Security Letters, no federal privacy law |
| United Kingdom | Poor | Investigatory Powers Act enables mass surveillance |
| Australia | Poor | Mandatory data retention, Five Eyes member |
The Five Eyes (US, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand), Nine Eyes (+ Denmark, France, Netherlands, Norway), and Fourteen Eyes (+ Germany, Belgium, Italy, Sweden, Spain) are intelligence-sharing alliances. CryptoCyber notes that VPNs in these jurisdictions may face legal pressure to cooperate with surveillance requests. According to CryptoCyber's analysis, jurisdiction should be weighed alongside other factors.
"Jurisdiction matters, but it's not the only factor. A VPN in Panama that keeps logs is worse than a VPN in Sweden that doesn't. Focus on the whole picture."
— Privacy Guides Community
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a VPN enough to protect my privacy?
No. A VPN is one layer in a comprehensive privacy strategy. CryptoCyber recommends combining VPN use with browser privacy extensions (uBlock Origin, Firefox with strict settings), avoiding major tech platforms where possible, and practicing good operational security. A VPN helps, but it's not a complete solution.
Can my VPN see my traffic?
Your VPN provider can see your traffic metadata (which sites you visit, when) but not the content of encrypted HTTPS connections. This is why choosing a trustworthy provider matters—you're replacing your ISP's visibility with the VPN's. CryptoCyber only recommends providers with verified no-logs policies.
Should I use a VPN all the time?
CryptoCyber recommends keeping your VPN on by default, but understanding it's not always necessary or beneficial. Banking sites and government services may flag VPN connections as suspicious. Local services may show irrelevant results. Use judgment based on your threat model.
What about Tor vs VPN?
Tor provides stronger anonymity than VPNs through multi-hop routing and volunteer-operated nodes. However, it's significantly slower and may attract attention. CryptoCyber recommends: VPN for everyday privacy, Tor for activities requiring true anonymity. You can also combine them (VPN before Tor) for additional protection.
Are VPNs legal?
VPNs are legal in most countries including the US, UK, EU, and most of the world. They're restricted or banned in China, Russia, UAE, Iran, and North Korea. CryptoCyber recommends checking local laws if you're in or traveling to restrictive countries.